Extra username and password are required for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It is usually a properly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
Case files may additionally be accessed from the public access terminals while in the clerk’s office of your court where the case was filed.
Note: Please fill any discipline and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave discipline blank.
Previous four tax years interpreted. It isn't from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
In this weblog post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Discovering its provisions plus the gravity of its punishment.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh click here & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Provided the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been from the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally seem, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really subject matter to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion may be deemed, however, we have been clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy issue to the approval in the competent authority. Read more
The Court deemed the case to become maintainable under Article 184 (3) Because the danger and encroachment alleged were which include to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
department concerned shall deliver the complete list of ACRs of the concerned officer to DPC perfectly in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
VI) The petitioner is at the rear of the bars considering the fact that arrest, investigation on the case is complete, he is no more expected to the purpose of investigation and at this stage to maintain him driving the bars before conclusion of trial will provide no useful purpose.
The DCFS social worker in charge of the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report on the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
A decrease court may not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it truly is unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. In case the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it could both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts with the cases; some jurisdictions allow for the judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.